Noah Slater wrote:
I would disagree with this, a standard that is ignored is still a
standard, it's just an ignored one.
The word "standard" doesn't mean something that's commonly used it
means something that is on a standards track specification.
What does that make a "de-facto standard"?
S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
