Your arguments should hold true for anything involving the word Nazi too:)
Interesting the control you are trying to exercise over our freedom to
discuss this topic.
Alia
David Tomlinson wrote:
Alia Sheikh wrote:
Dave,
So we can have this discussion in only a manner which is determined
by yourself?
Children count, pictures of dogs count, pictures of someone's gran or
bank statement or a tree counts. If your arguments hold tight then
they hold tight for all examples. Hard to have a discussion when
people threaten to take their ball away and not play anymore.
Which signifies no more than the end of this discussion with you
perhaps, but thought it worth mentioning in case the negative
reactions to that statement were just whistling past.
Alia
If you wish to talk about personal images use the example of adults, a
spouse for example. Or personal information. Involving children is
like using the word Nazi, it is designed to close down debate, because
of the moral panic surrounding the issue.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
