On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 13:09, David Tomlinson <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I'd like to see some hard numbers/evidence for this statement. How much
>> are the costs? In dollars and pounds? How much is the benefit? Not
>> statements of principle, but numbers.
>>
>> My opinion is that is you had hard numbers, the case for abolishing
>> copyright would not stack up, and that copyright creates more benefits
>> than it costs - in numbers.
>>
> I don't but others do.
>
> A dutch filesharing study.
> http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/01/20/dutch.study.file.sharing/
>
> Outcome filesharing is revenue positive, many other studies have reached the
> same conclusion.

Permitting (and encouraging) filesharing is not the same as abolishing
copyright. Thankfully, it’s not incompatible with copyright, either.
Indeed, it’s been trialled as a catch-up/distribution mechanism by
PSBs outside of the UK over the past couple of years, with decent
results.

M.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to