On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:33:18 +0000, Mo McRoberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Exactly the same problem exists with Creative Commons NC licenses - > there isn't a solid definition of what "non-commercial" actually > means. The CC actually ran a consultation on it, and were going to > do... something, at some point. As far as I know, nothing's happened > yet (beyond noting that if you think there's a possibility your usage > might be considered 'commercial', you're best off just asking the > licensor whether what they think of your proposed use, which does > somewhat defeat the purpose of standardised licenses).
CC have run a consultation on this - http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/17127 - Rob. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
