On 22-Jan-2010, at 16:50, Rob Myers wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:33:18 +0000, Mo McRoberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> CC actually ran a consultation on it, and were going to >> do... something, at some point.
… > CC have run a consultation on this - > > http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/17127 :) The debate continues on the CC mailing list. This one won't get resolved until v4 of the licenses is out. MIT produced this statement for OpenCourseWare, which at least mitigates the problem a little: http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/terms/terms/index.htm#noncomm (Also, MIT’s interpretation of “non-commercial” is one I’m entirely happy with). If somebody with a BBC hat could throw it into the ring, especially in the context of the MIT page, that’d be grand ;) (it’s probably worth thinking about trying to come up with a similar page for backstage and getting it approved by the BBC legal eagles——Ian?) M. -- mo mcroberts http://nevali.net iChat: [email protected] Jabber/GTalk: [email protected] Twitter: @nevali Run Leopard or Snow Leopard? Set Quick Look free with DropLook - http://labs.jazzio.com/DropLook/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
