David Rees wrote: > On 3/26/07, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lets hope this doesnt wrap around... as you can see load is in 0.1-0.01 >> range. >> >> 1 users Load 0.12 0.05 0.01 Mar 27 07:30 >> >> Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER >> Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out >> Act 26020 3592 144912 6868 12384 count >> All 249784 5456 2327896 11800 pages > > It wrapped pretty badly, but let me see if I'm interpreting this right > (I'm no BSD expert, either): > > 1. Your server has ~250MB of memory. > 2. Load average during backups is only 0.1-0.01? Does BSD calculate > load average differently than Linux? Linux calculates load average by > looking at the number of runnable tasks - this means if you have a > single process waiting on disk IO you will have a load average of 1. > If BSD calculates the load average the same way, then that means your > server is not waiting on disk, but waiting for the clients. > > What's the load like on the clients you are backing up? > > -Dave
2- The process is idle when it is waiting data from the disk (not in active state) So FreeBSD doesnt count it towards the load. I dont see why it should actually? Are processes which are waiting data from disk use CPU in Linux? 1- You are right, I will increase the memory a little bit. I will return back the results when I accomplish that. :) Lets hope it will decrease disk reads. Thanks, Evren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
