On 09/07 12:39 , Stephen Zemlicka wrote: > I like the idea of backing up the vmware image. That way you have very > little restore time. Just copy and you're up and running. No reconfig > necessary. If you use rsync, shouldn't it just copy the changed data? I > understand files on the image might move around but majority should stay the > same and therefore the data wouldn't have to be copied for each backup.
we'd like to think that, but my experience does not bear that out. that said, I haven't done strict scientific tests. you're right; restoring the vmware image is a very convenient thing; but unless it's been quiesced (i.e. shut down) you can't guarantee a consistent state. I've gotten away with restoring 'live' vmware images from backup (tape backup, way back when); but I wouldn't recommend it. if you want easy restores of a vmware image; build some sort of mechanism that shuts down the vmware guest instance, then does a backup of the image, then starts the vmware guest again. our web developer at work does this for his Windows session, keeping the old copies around (bzip2'ed) in case he needs to revert. you do sacrifice a lot of speed for this ease and simplicity of recovery tho. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
