you know, i just read those stats on wikipedia quality.
anonymous users have higher quality posts when post count is low. as post
count increases, quality drops
registered users have medium quality posts when post count is low but
quality increases as post count increases!
--
with that in mind, i 'almost' feel that having it open like it is might
encourage some quality posts by non-registered members. we just need to
police it and keep backups.
any other thoughts?
On 10/18/07, Holger Parplies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> dan wrote on 11.10.2007 at 15:04:16 [Re: [BackupPC-users] wiki and
> forums]:
> > [context lost by top-posting]
> > only sourceforge members may edit. that is correct
>
> that's three votes for "you need a SF login to edit" and one reality
> against.
>
> I guess that's in favour of you and reality will need to adapt. Until it
> does, I'll continue editing anonymously. You can actually use the
> "comment"
> line to comment your changes, by the way. When trying to be helpful
> (writing
> wiki pages), why not make a point of being helpful (to other wiki
> editors)?
>
> Regards,
> Holger
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
