I too would find a single admin interface helpful. I'm running 4, soon to be 5 BackupPC servers. They're at different locations, so a single pool is out of the question, but I would love to be able to take a look at all my backups without having to log into 4 different front ends.

However, I also love the idea of a remote sync for BackupPC. I recognize that one of my huge limitations is that if one of my buildings burns to the ground, my backups on the local BackupPC server are gone too. This would be alleviated with some sort of offline copy at a remote location, but I don't know how to set one up due to all the links involved in the BackupPC pool.


Justin Best
503.906.7611


On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:24 PM, Corey Baldwin wrote:

My needs are somewhat different.  I've got seperate backup servers
because I need the space. I've currently got 23T of available storage, spread across 8 servers and backing up close to 30T of data. There's no
way I can have my pool on a single filesystem.

I'm mainly interested in administering multiple copies of BackupPC from a single interface. It sounds like others would like to cluster BackupPC.

Anybody with these same interests?

Corey

dan wrote:
David. I have been thinking a lot about this as i have an interesting
setup that multiple backup servers would be usefull for as well as a
cluster filesystem with redundancy.

I would like to have 1 cluster filesystem with 3 backup server attached
to it.  I have 3 'main' sites and20 satelites and each satilite is
served by these main sites.  i would like to put a backuppc server at
each site for that segments backups as that would distribute my network
load as well as allow the cluster filesystem to retain remote
redundancy. My idea on this was to have just one server do the nightly
process and disable the nightly process on the other 2 backuppc
servers.  they would not need to do the nightly because the first
machine would handle the pool cleanup for all of them on the cluster
filesystem.  each machine could share the same pool.

the tricks are 1)finding the right cluster filesystem that you can set
the number of remote copies so in my case 3 copies, that would
essentially make them all live mirrors. 2) makeing sure that having
multiple servers writing to the filesystem and therefore to the pool
simultaniously would not create any issues and 3) managing bandwidth on
the cluster filesystem so it does not saturate the connections.

this does not solve the issue of having 1 interface for all the servers
but pulls all the backups together as a more cohesive solution.

alternatively i was going to get a fancy RAID controller like a DELL
PERC5 or something that can take 512MB of cache memory and allow more
backups to run simultaniuosly but im worried about saturating my T1.

a really issue here is that the prefered method for backups is rsync and it has some serious issues with large numbers of files. I have 2GB of RAM in my server and im startion to run into issues syncing my backuppc
machine accross the network because of filecount.


On Jan 20, 2008 8:45 PM, David Nalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

My employer would even go so far as to be willing to contribute to a
   bounty for this. By and large I know that such isn't generally of
   interest to Craig, but don't know how else to help push gthe
   development of such an addition.


   -----Original Message-----
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Sent: Sun 1/20/2008 9:12 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
   [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple BPC CGI interface.

I second some level of modification for mulitserver environments or "clustered" backup servers with common SAN/NAS storage. Then have a primary backup machine and slaves so that all backups are managed by the master and it assignes the job to the appropriate cluster member
   which may be itself.

   I would much rather have a master/slave cluster environment than
   just an interface that included a number of machines.

   This does imply some change to the storage mechanism to allow
   multiple users concurrent access to the same fileset or the use of
   some cluster filesystem.

I know a lot of people like simplicity but there is.a certain level
   of complexoty neccessary for backuppc to reach the next level.


   Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

   -----Original Message-----
From: Corey Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>

   Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:03:08
   To:[email protected]
   <mailto:To:[email protected]>
   Subject: [BackupPC-users] Multiple BPC CGI interface.


   Has anybody seen or is anybody interested in developing a multiple
   server interface for BackupPC?

I've currently got 8 backup servers running, and although I've got a back-end system for tracking where client machines are backed up, a
   single CGI interface that managed them all would be ideal.

   Thoughts?

   --
   Thank you,
   Corey Baldwin
   Mojohost..

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

   This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
   Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
   http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
   <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>
   _______________________________________________
   BackupPC-users mailing list
   [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   List:     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
   Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
   Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
   Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
   http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
   _______________________________________________
   BackupPC-users mailing list
   [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
   <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users>
   Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
   Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
   <http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>



--
Thank you,
Corey Baldwin
Mojohost..

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to