stephen wrote:
 > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
 > 
 > > You also have to know how many references there are to each pool item.
 > > That is, pretty much duplicate the code of a filesystem without gaining
 > > much.  And you can't let any of this change for the duration it takes to
 > > complete your mirroring.
 > 
 > I understand how the hardlinks are used (and it works pretty well) but I 
 > can't help but think that a database of file references would work as well 
 > (possibly better) than the hardlinks...

personally, i'd want to weigh that against the full transparency and
simplicity of the current solution.  i <heart> that i can cd into
the PC tree and/or the pool if i need to -- for instance, if the
restore tools aren't currently available or convenvient.  i have
trouble believing that a database solution would be as
satisfying, to me.

paul
=---------------------
 paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (arlington, ma, where it's 27.3 degrees)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to