John Pettitt wrote:
> Bruno Faria wrote:
>> Hello to everyone,
>>
>> Lately for some reason, BackupPC has been running very slow on a 
>> server that we have configured to do backups. Just so that you guys 
>> can have an idea of how slow it really is going, it took BackupPC  
>> 10265.2 minutes to backup 1656103 files totaling to only 24 gigabytes 
>> worth of files. Obviously, I can't really wait a week for a 24 gigbyte 
>> backup to be done. Now here's what makes me think that this problem 
>> with BackupPC could be due to server hardware: I first started started 
>> doing backups for one pc at a time, and it took BackupPC 468.8 minutes 
>> to backup 2626069 files or 32 gigabyte worth of files for that same 
>> computer. But now I have about 45 computers added to BackupPC and 
>> sometimes BackupPC is backing up 30 of them or more at the same time, 
>> and that's when the server really goes slow.
>>
>> Here's the top command when the BackupPC server is going slow:
>> top - 19:06:36 up 15 days,  6:11,  3 users,  load average: 28.76, 
>> 39.03, 32.14
>> Tasks: 156 total,   1 running, 155 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
>> Cpu(s):  3.7% us,  2.2% sy,  0.0% ni,  7.7% id, 86.0% wa,  0.4% hi,  
>> 0.0% si
>> Mem:   1033496k total,  1019896k used,    13600k free,   141720k buffers
>> Swap:  5116692k total,  2538712k used,  2577980k free,    41932k cached
> 
> Any time your load average is more than your # of CPU's your system is 
> contending for CPU.    You are also  using a lot of swap which makes me 
> think your box has gone into thrashing death spiral.   Add ram, limit 
> the number of simultaneous backups (I found by trial and error that the 
> number of spindles in the backup array is a good starting point for how 
> many backups can be run at once).
> 
> In the server I just upgraded  (Code 2 quad 2ghz, 2GB, 1.5TB ufs on 
> RAID10 ,  FreeBSD 7.0) my backups run between 3.6 MB/sec for a remote 
> server (*) and 56 MB/sec for a volume full of digital media on a gig-e 
> connected mac pro.     Having a multi core CPU make a big difference 
> (bigger than I expected).
> 
> (*) rsync is a wonderful thing -  six times the actual line speed.
> 
> John
> 

Just out of curiosity: why not using using ZFS? Is it really to be 
considered experimental? ZFS could be a reason for me  to switch to 
FreeBDS, I remember dan to be the expert on ZFS - any news?

Bernhard



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to