Bernhard Ott wrote: > John Pettitt wrote: > >> In the server I just upgraded (Code 2 quad 2ghz, 2GB, 1.5TB ufs on >> RAID10 , FreeBSD 7.0) my backups run between 3.6 MB/sec for a remote >> server (*) and 56 MB/sec for a volume full of digital media on a gig-e >> connected mac pro. Having a multi core CPU make a big difference >> (bigger than I expected). >> >> (*) rsync is a wonderful thing - six times the actual line speed. >> >> John >> >> > > Just out of curiosity: why not using using ZFS? Is it really to be > considered experimental? ZFS could be a reason for me to switch to > FreeBDS, I remember dan to be the expert on ZFS - any news? > > Bernhard > > > The box is an upgrade from a 6.x machine and I haven't rebuilt with zfs yet - I probably won't until 7.1 - backups are not the place to play with experimental file systems.
John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
