Tim Chipman a écrit : > check your config file for the specific server in question > > I found this same behaviour, it is if you have a null path at end of > stanza of paths to backup > > so what it is literally telling you, is that it finished the first > (real, desired) work > but failed on the (unwanted, null) work > > hence the confusion > > In my case, I think the null field was appended via the web interface, > by accident, when I was doing initial config / setup of paths to be > backed up. At first I thought it was an rsync issue, but I had > identical behaviour with "tar" as well. Lots of fun! :-) > > Took a few weeks before the answer jumped out at me.. > > -Tim
Hello Tim, I will check now. Thanks ;-) -- Didier ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
