On 8/28/09, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim Wilcoxson wrote: >>> What does it use to map the hardlinks internally? Is this >>> likely to remain correct if backuppc rebuilds collision chains in the >>> pool during a copy - or even before the next incremental? >> >> I'm not very familiar with the internals of BackupPC, but if you have >> a set of files that are hard-linked, back them up with HashBackup, >> delete the files, back that up, then recreate the hard-linked files >> and back them up again, it should work even though the new series of >> files will likely have different inodes. > > Backuppc finds pool matches with a hash computation and keeps an extra > hardlink with the hash as a filename. There are collisions in this > scheme and as a part of pool maintenance the collision-chain files may > be renamed. If you track the source inode numbers they should stay the > same - but you'll end up with a table of millions to match up.
I'll do some reading today about the BackupPC internals. When backing up a BackupPC server, it might not make sense to keep a lot of HB versions since BPC does its own versioning - maybe just 1-3 HB versions, to be on the safe side. This might keep the renaming / collision overhead in check. Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
