Michael Stowe wrote:
>> Another thing about BackupPC is that by my reading, new files are
>> first written to the PC area, then pool links are created by
>> BackupPC_link. This suggests that backing up the pool last might
>> improve performance, because it is likely to be more fragmented.
>
> Let me just say ... huh? What file system are you using that
> fragmentation is a significant issue?
With backuppc the issue is not so much fragmentation within a file as
the distance between the directory entry, the inode, and the file
content. When creating a new file, filesystems generally attempt to
allocate these close to each other, but when you link an existing file
into a new directory, that obviously can't be done so you end up with a
lot of long seeks when you try to traverse directories picking up the
inode info.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
