Thanks for you response.
I think for me, the best solution is 1,2,3,4 for Incremental Levels (if I
have no problem with backup). I will test it.

And what do you think of my method ?

Thanks.


2010/7/1 Saturn2888 <backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com>

>
> I would do successive incrementals, but only if the same exact files aren't
> changing each time. For instance, successive incrementals do not benefit you
> if files X changed today, and it changes tomorrow, and it changes the next
> day only if file X is the file that chances the most.
>
> If file X is a text file, successive incrementals might be useful so long
> as the same blocks of text from the day before still exist in the file. This
> is going to be pretentious for any file whose changes persist day to day
> even if there are changes.
>
> The one time you, for-sure, want to use successive incrementals is if you
> have the processing power, disk space, and amount of files that change
> day-to-day to require it. Especially if you're on a limited line like a VPN
> over the Internet, it would be beneficial to check for changes from the day
> before than say 6 days before as you'd wanna copy less information rather
> than more.
>
> The more successive incremental levels you add, the slower it goes. 6 will
> always yield decent speeds. I have mine setup at home for 8, but even that
> might be too much for a one-drive setup. I used to have it setup for 60 and
> each incremental past level 18 would start to show slowdown. It would start
> to take 6-7 hours to backup the same host that, at lower incremental levels,
> took only a few tens of minutes.
>
> I would try the successive incrementals and see where it takes you. Test
> between them both for 2 different weeks and that will tell you which to
> choose for sure. I like successive incrementals, I just don't like using
> them at higher levels because it really really begins to slow things down.
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by saturn2...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to