I love BackupPC, it's so much simpler than Amanda and Bacula. Unfortunately it's performance is a 10-fold lower on my servers.
Host User #Full Full Age (days) Full Size (GB) Speed (MB/s) #Incr Incr Age (days) Last Backup (days) State Last attempt antispam backuppc 1 2.0 1.98 2.53 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle directadmin01 backuppc 1 2.0 15.30 1.16 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle dns1 backuppc 1 2.0 2.44 1.43 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle dns2 backuppc 1 2.0 2.35 0.18 1 1.0 1.0 idle idle plesk01 backuppc 1 1.9 10.79 0.85 1 0.9 0.9 idle idle I wish to back-up a total of 20 servers, but I am not sure if I should pick BackupPC due to poor performance. The load on the servers is very low and rsnapshot/bacula back-ups often performed with speeds above 10MB per second. I have disabled compression as this caused a fairly high cpu load on the servers. The servers are connected via 1gbit network and no more than 2 simultanous back-ups are running. What performance have users here reached in terms of MB/sec for complete servers? And how poor is the 1.5MB/sec average I am having here? The servers have low load, the network performance is good. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
