Richard Shaw wrote at about 16:40:10 -0500 on Wednesday, July 27, 2011: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:42 PM, C. Ronoz <chro...@eproxy.nl> wrote: > >> Depending on how comfortable you are building your own packages, > >> Fedora has 3.2.1 almost ready to go. We had to package two perl > >> modules for the added FTP support. > >> > >> If you are willing to try them but don't want to build yourself I > >> could probably build them for you. > > Sure, I'll try NetBackup 3.2.1. I have not build packages before myself, > > although I wouldn't mind first using Fedora to see if the performance will > > actually be good for me. > > It hasn't been released yet as the two perl modules in question are > making their way through QA before they'll make it to the stable > repos. > > I have built packages x86_64 packages, let me know if you need 32 bit > packages instead. > > > Richard
Any chances of backporting this to older Fedora versions? (I still run Fedora 12) That being said, I did build a 3.2.0 rpm package for Fedora 12 -- I didn't add FTP dependencies so it works as is without any extra Perl packages. I would be happy to share it if anybody is interested (either the source or the binary rpm). One of these days I will upgrade that to 3.2.1... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
