> >> Naturally, I do lose ACLs and whatnot, but aside from a few tweaks,
> >> the process at least works.  I've been considering adding a
> >> supplemental ACL backup to the routine.
> >
> > That sounds like a useful idea, but really, what are the ACL's used
> > for? Is that just additional end-user type of customisation where you
> > might specify only user X can access folder X, and folder Y is world
> > read but write by group Z etc... ? ie, is that just a security issue,
> > or does it prevent the actual OS or applications from working?
>
> In practice, the only issue I had were the "hidden" and "system"
> attributes being missing from desktop.ini files.  Aside from being ugly,
> this caused the OS to launch an editor for them on boot (which seems odd
> to me.)
>
>
Would it help to update the client versions of rsync and cygwin?  I recall
doing that when working on getting your solution to restore natively (via
rsync - and just selected files, not bare metal).  It helped with fixing
some ACL issues, so it may preserve some attributes better.

-Kris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to