John Rouillard <rouilj-backu...@renesys.com> wrote on 09/17/2012 02:33:34
PM:
> I have another system that is lower power:
>
> 2632652.8 MB at 662.5 minutes or 66MB/s
That's 2.6TB in 11 hours. That is perfectly acceptable for me. And *way*
better than I'm getting.
> the BackupPC system is a 4 core system with Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm)
> Processor 2216 (2412.400 MHz).
So 2 CPU sockets, each of which is a dual-core processor?
> 16GB of memory with 4x1TB disks. Raid 5
> running 3ware raid card with BBU cache.
So a single block device presented to the OS?
> For the majority of the time
> that backup runs, there are only 3 or so other jobs runing at the same
> time.
OK.
What about checksum caching and compression?
Thank you *very* much for this information. Your 24-core 48GB monster is
just too far away from what I've got to be a useful comparison. But this
one, while quite a bit bigger, is at least *somewhat* comparable. And
you're getting four times the performance, which is what I would have
estimated that my box was capable of doing, but is not.
Timothy J. Massey
Out of the Box Solutions, Inc.
Creative IT Solutions Made Simple!
http://www.OutOfTheBoxSolutions.com
tmas...@obscorp.com
22108 Harper Ave.
St. Clair Shores, MI 48080
Office: (800)750-4OBS (4627)
Cell: (586)945-8796
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
