On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:11:20PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Timothy J Massey <tmas...@obscorp.com> > wrote: > > > > I would not expect the network speed changing from 100Mb to 1Gb to make a > > difference: this server is literally unchanged from one run to the next. > > I wouldn't expect any difference by adding more bandwidth than you > [...] > to be slow. Backups will almost always thresh any disk buffer/cache > that might make other types of access seem faster. > > However, I just run into a situation in an rsync restore where both > ends were sitting in a select() apparently waiting for each other for > so long I gave up and used a tar download. Maybe there is a bug > somewhere.
Yup. I have discussed it multiple times: http://adsm.org/lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-09/msg00136.html http://adsm.org/lists/html/BackupPC-users/2010-02/msg00075.html http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.backuppc.general/18179 but always when doing a backup not while doing a restore. -- -- rouilj John Rouillard System Administrator Renesys Corporation 603-244-9084 (cell) 603-643-9300 x 111 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
