On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:40:57 +1000 Adam Goryachev <mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au> wrote:
> I think you want both snapshots on the local server, as well as BPC on > a remote server. They each serve a different need. Hmm, I'm not that sure; for the time being, snapshots will be kept and doubled w/ other BPC servers for daily "snapshots" of only work directories. Time will say if ZFS snapshots are mandatory or completely replace by daily BPC. The current architecture being a 3-2-1 w/ redondant level 2. > You might also want > a image copy on a remote server, which is yet another different > requirement. I guess you mean for total reconstruction (?) At this time I did not found any significant gain of time between image (which, BTW, takes a lot of time/bandwidth/disk space to achieve) and a BPC reconstruction done from a minimal OS installation. Not to mention that in a release last months of life, it is sometimes important to use backports to avoid a hard transition with the next release (hence, forcing to multiply images.) JY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
