On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:17:41 -0700
Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users <backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
wrote:

> Sorry that it isn't very clearly stated

Nooo, there's no more sorry in stock… may be a little forgive,
for the lowest rate of $9999.91 (sub-primed credit allowed) ;-p)

> and it doesn't depend on the real client's inode (and
> inode numbers) on the file system being backed up.

Ahhh, NOW this is crystal clear; however, it wasn't in the
aforementioned doc's page.

I may sound dumb/punctilious, but on my reading I really understood what
I asked about (may be it is because I'm always strive to see things like
a user will.)

>  Therefore it's
> portable across different underlying file systems on the server.

Yeah, now let's port it to the Apple ][ CP/M card, then build a
cluster of 120KB 5"1/4 diskettes and conquer the (known) world
by backuping it ! :))
(yeah, I'm not that young anymore, may be that's what explains the
dumb/punctilious way of live.)

Thanks for your answer, Craig; it is now clear that BPCv4 "inodes
storing" is way different than the OS one.

Jean-Yves

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to