On Wednesday 12 September 2007 21:25, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 12 Sep 2007 at 20:15, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:00:59 -0400, Dan Langille said:
> > >
> > > Priority: normal
> > > Content-description: Mail message body
> > >
> > > After I encounterd repeated cores of bacula-sd, Eric Bollengier
> > > suggested this patch. It passed my first set of regression tests
> > > without producing a bacula-sd.core
> > >
> > > The traceback appears at the end of this email. Any objections to a
> > > commit now?
> > >
> > > $ svn di
> > > Index: stored/stored.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- stored/stored.c (revision 5534)
> > > +++ stored/stored.c (working copy)
> > > @@ -600,10 +600,10 @@
> > > if (debug_level > 10) {
> > > print_memory_pool_stats();
> > > }
> > > - term_reservations_lock();
> > > term_msg();
> > > cleanup_crypto();
> > > free_volume_list();
> > > + term_reservations_lock();
> > > close_memory_pool();
> > >
> > > sm_dump(false); /* dump orphaned buffers */
> > > $
> >
> > Looks right, but that won't fix the bacula-fd crash you included below
> > :-)
>
> You win:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/BaculaRegressionTesting] $ gdb bin/bacula-sd bacula-
> sd.core
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
> you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
> details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...
> Core was generated by `bacula-sd'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.4...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.4
> Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3
> Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8
> Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libssl.so.5...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libssl.so.5
> Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.5...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.5
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5
> Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
> Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done.
> Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> #0 0x0808ab61 in jcr_walk_start () at dlist.h:187
> 187 dlist.h: No such file or directory.
> in dlist.h
> [New Thread 0x28601900 (LWP 100488)]
> [New Thread 0x28601100 (LWP 100346)]
> (gdb) backtrace
> #0 0x0808ab61 in jcr_walk_start () at dlist.h:187
> #1 0x0808aee0 in get_jobid_from_tid (tid=0x28601900) at jcr.c:467
> #2 0x0808af43 in get_jobid_from_tid () at jcr.c:460
> #3 0x080731d3 in free_volume_list () at reserve.c:514
> #4 0x0804c9ac in terminate_stored (sig=15) at stored.c:606
> #5 0x08097519 in signal_handler (sig=15) at signal.c:180
> #6 0xbfbfffb4 in ?? ()
> #7 0x0000000f in ?? ()
> #8 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> #9 0xbf3f8bc0 in ?? ()
> #10 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> #11 0x08097260 in init_stack_dump () at signal.c:190
> #12 0x281051de in pthread_cond_init () from /lib/libthr.so.3
> #13 0x0809b2d6 in workq_server (arg=0x28644100) at workq.c:332
> #14 0x280fea7f in pthread_getprio () from /lib/libthr.so.3
> #15 0xbf1f6fec in ?? ()
> Current language: auto; currently c++
> (gdb)
>
> Now... you gotta fix for that fd core? ;)
The above is an SD crash due to the term_reservations_lock() problem.
By the way, I think there is a problem with your kernel/debugger. The stack
dump after about frame 10 looks to me like they have gone too far, perhaps
into another thread or something ...
>
> FWIW, I'm rerunning all the tests on FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE with gcc
> 3.4.6 to see if I can reproduce the core there. The cores have all
> happened on FreeBSD 7.x (not -STABLE) with gcc 4.2.0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
