>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:53:40 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > On 12 Sep 2007 at 22:42, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > On Wednesday 12 September 2007 21:25, Dan Langille wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/BaculaRegressionTesting] $ gdb bin/bacula-fd bacula- > fd.core > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... > Core was generated by `bacula-fd'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.4...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.4 > Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3 > Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 > Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libssl.so.5...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libssl.so.5 > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.5...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.5 > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...done. > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5 > Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...done. > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7 > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > #0 get_first_port_host_order (addrs=0x5a5a5a5a) at address_conf.h:64 > 64 address_conf.h: No such file or directory. > in address_conf.h > [New Thread 0x28601200 (LWP 100058)] > [New Thread 0x28601100 (LWP 100478)] > (gdb) backtrace > #0 get_first_port_host_order (addrs=0x5a5a5a5a) at address_conf.h:64 > #1 0x0804cc93 in terminate_filed (sig=15) at filed.c:238 > #2 0x0807dbf9 in signal_handler (sig=15) at signal.c:180 > #3 0xbfbfffb4 in ?? () > #4 0x0000000f in ?? () > #5 0x00000000 in ?? () > #6 0xbf9febc0 in ?? () > #7 0x00000000 in ?? () > #8 0x0807d940 in init_stack_dump () at signal.c:190 > #9 0x280e41de in pthread_cond_init () from /lib/libthr.so.3 > #10 0x08081588 in watchdog_thread (arg=0x0) at watchdog.c:307 > #11 0x280dda7f in pthread_getprio () from /lib/libthr.so.3 > #12 0x00000000 in ?? () > Current language: auto; currently c++ > (gdb) > > > By the way, I think there is a problem with your kernel/debugger. The > > stack > > dump after about frame 10 looks to me like they have gone too far, perhaps > > into another thread or something ... > > Could that happen if I did a gdb on a old core? That is, one which > was not produced from the current source code?
I think it is because the system libraries are compiled with optimization and without debug info so gdb doesn't know how to generate the backtrace. __Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
