Hi,

Kern Sibbald wrote:

> For Chris: well if you consider 22MB/sec vs 25MB/sec *far* slower you have a 
> different concept of the world than I do.  Yes, one might expect Bacula to be 

Sorry for not being very clear. It is "far" slower because we are 
replacing two LTO-2 tape drives with a single LTO-4. We could write to 
both of these LTO 2 at a combined rate of ~50MB/sec, but since I cannot 
get more than ~22MB/sec out of bacula writing to LTO-4 in its default 
configuration, it will be "far" slower overall :)

> able to write to an LTO-4 faster than an LTO-2, but it many cases the tape 
> write time is not the big bottleneck in a Bacula backup.

Indeed, and that is why I spent a very long time benchmarking various 
parts of bacula. I have seen that bacula will happily back up this data 
to the Fifo /dev/null device at about 100MB/sec.

The moment I start using the tape again the figure drops to ~22MB/sec.

Changing the block size in bacula is the only way I have seen that will 
increase performance.

I have considered upgraded the kernel from 2.6.15 to 2.6.22.

> You might get much more satisfactory results if you start with a different 
> premise from "Bacula *will not* write any faster to ... than ...".  An

That's a bit unfair IMO :) I *love* bacula am I am a very happy bacula 
user at home.

That however is my conclusion, based on empirical evidence, after 
spending several weeks benchmarking bacula. Unfortunately I cannot 
immediately dump my results to the list for confidentiality reasons and 
NDAs (yes, it sucks...). I will however do my best to post further 
benchmarks to the list.

> appropriate one might be "what are the things I can do to speed up the 
> backups?" or "what really are the bottlenecks",

That is *exactly* what I posted here! :)

> or "why can someone else 
> write at 72.28 M bytes/second, but my system does not?".

Indeed, though it's not a particularly fair comparison: different types 
of LTO drives made by different manufacturers, with a different HBA, 
different connection (SAS vs SCSI), and a different kernel.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to