On Thursday 04 October 2007 14:56, Frank Sweetser wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > You probably mixed the trunk and the Branch code. You must explicitly > > checkout a new copy of the Branch into a clean directory, or do an "svn > > update" on a directory that was originally checked out from the branch. > > If you checkout into a directory that was previously used for the trunk, > > you will probably have some bizarre mixture ... > > > > My local copy seems of the branch seems to be perfectly valid and does > > contain a copy of enh_fnmatch.c (deleted in trunk). However, over the > > next few hours, I will check out a fresh copy just to be sure. > > Found the glitch! I did check out a fresh copy of the 2.2 branch, and it > does indeed include enh_fnmatch.c; however, the file is not referenced in > the Makefile. The attached fixes compilation for me. > > And now to run the actual regression tests...
Ah, many thanks. It was removed when I back ported the 2.3.x code because it is no longer used in 2.3.x. What I cannot figure out is why it built on my machine. Perhaps I have a enh_fnmatch.o that was copied from the source ... Anyway, thanks. I have applied the patch and committed it. This is what is really great about having regession testers! :-) Regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
