On Tuesday 09 October 2007 17:03, Carsten Menke wrote: > Carsten Menke wrote: > > Dan Langille wrote: > >> On 4 Oct 2007 at 11:37, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>> Could each of the regression testers please test the code for version > >>> 2.2.5? > > I've uploaded the results, the output is 4,2 MB so I uploaded it as a > textfile and as a compressed version which has 160 K > > http://prozesse-im-unternehmen.de/opensource/debug/bacula-debug.txt > http://prozesse-im-unternehmen.de/opensource/debug/bacula-debug.txt.bz2
It looks to me like the weird files tests are failing because of some sorting or time differences. Only a careful inspection of the output files that are being compared can determine what is happening -- on a quick look, it appears to be a false alert. However, the hard-link test is really failing, which is not a good sign. One would have to take a more careful look at why the restore failed to understand the problem. This looks like a real problem. Regards, Kern > > I've done the tests with ./do_all > > Regards > > Carsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
