Actually I don't know what to think. its not, however, good press for bacula.
No news may be good news, But some news is bad news! I do think that it needs to be fixed Kern says that it could need a 'massive' rewrite, really, though I don't think so. It may be in lots of funny places but should be fixable with a simple search and replace. The real issue is the DB's may need a conversion script to change the names. This is not the sort of thing than can be done in point release. So much is obvious. The other thing I think is that the DB schema is umm... overly expedient. I imagine speed was of critical importance when Kern was designing it. I do have a possible replacement, arising out work I did some years back. Let me start another thread.. Dan Langille wrote: > John Huttley wrote: >> https://people.planetpostgresql.org/xzilla/index.php?/archives/360-Bacula,-Sqlite,-Postgres...-when-good-tools-go-horribly-horribly-wrong.html >> >> > > John: whenever people post a URL without commenting up on it, I always > ask them for their comments upon it. > > John: What do you think? > > and FYI, no, it is not bad SQL. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
