Hello Lucas, I received your signed FLA agreements this morning. Many thanks. I will be sending them on to the FSFE, who will sign them, then send one back to you. Don't be worried if it takes a bit of time.
Many thanks for your contribution. As you know, Eric has already committed it to the git repo :-) Best regards, Kern On Monday 07 December 2009 18:14:07 Lucas B. Cohen wrote: > I wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Not all Bacula man pages are up to date with the new options introduced > > in v3.0, or older options, or were somewhat inconsistent with other > > manpages, or their interactive (--help) equivalent. > > > > All the options were taken from v3.0.3's interactive help, so there > > could be some more missing; but the patches were made against the latest > > versions. > > > > Also, the pages for bsmtp doesn't seem to go by the usual manpage > > sections, and btraceback's is still in its infancy. Maybe it's why they > > got removed from the Debian distribution, so I'm thinking of rewriting > > and reformatting them to make a shinier package. Are there objections or > > guidelines to this ? > > Here are > - five more updates to manpages options I had forgotten in a corner, > - a reformated and edited page for bsmtp > - a brand new one for btraceback, based on the Problem Resolution Guide > and discussions (to be continued?) on this list. > > The patches try to use the DEP-3 headers [1], a proposal designed to > help distributions track and manage patches. They also contain dpatch > information, for the same purpose. All of this is just comments > prepended can be stripped off with no harm, the actual patch is in > standard git format. > > [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
