Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote on 2010/07/24 19:16:32:
>
> On 7/24/2010 12:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Kern Sibbald<k...@sibbald.com>  wrote on 2010/07/24 17:56:46:
> >> If it is not your code, I need to see the original copyright to know how 
> >> to be
> >> able to include it, but if it is not your code, then it is unlikely we can
> >> use it.
> >
> > It is my code, as you can see there is nothing left of the original code
> > after applying my patch.
> > Earlier you mentioned LGPL, is that OK?
>
> The following is speculation and be completely wrong.
>
> It sounds like you took code and patched it.  The result is not your
> code.  Your code is code you write from scratch.  It sounds like you
> modified existing code. In which case, I believe you must honor the
> copyrights on that original code.  Thus, you may be unable to change the
> copyright.

Not if nothing of the old code remains. If you still have doubts
it is better I just stop here and let you figure out how to
impl. it instead(if you still want a better crc32).

 Jocke


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to