> 
> On Jul 23, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> 
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > On 23/07/2011 04:14, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> >>> Yes I have an objection, it will slow down all backups
> >>
> >> As mentioned elsewhere, someone consider restore more important
than
> backups.
> >
> > So, he can add this index, I don't advise it because I think that we
can do
> get the same improvement for restore with a code patch and without
touching
> the backup part.
> 
> Such a code patch is much welcomed, but I don't see anyone able to
produce it
> yet.  I'm willing but have no time.
> 

What would be really cool for restoring is if Bacula didn't need to
enumerate the entire directory tree to do the file selection. Aside from
the 'restore everything' jobs, most of the restores I've done have only
been for a handful of files. It would be nice if Bacula would just
enumerate what it needed to, eg at the start Bacula loads / into memory.
If you then want to see /usr/ it enumerates that, and so on.

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to