On 16.03.19 16:04, Dan Langille wrote: > I am the FreeBSD maintainer for bat. > > At present, the FreeBSD port depends upon qt4. Is qt4 still a requirement > for bat? > > I ask because: > > * qt4 has been deprecated since December 2015 (i.e. > 3 years) > * bacula9 bat will be removed from the FreeBSD ports tree today because of > that deprecation > * My attempts today to compile without qt4 fail
bat compiles with Qt5, but you may need to resort to some trickery to get it to work. See the following links about the stuff we need to do to get it working for Debian (and Gentoo): https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/control#L26 https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/rules#L14 https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/rules#L185 https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/patches/debian/fix-qmake-binary-source-path Not all of that may or may not be applicable to FreeBSD. Grüße, Sven. _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
