> On Mar 16, 2019, at 11:42 AM, Sven Hartge <s...@svenhartge.de> wrote: > > On 16.03.19 16:04, Dan Langille wrote: >> I am the FreeBSD maintainer for bat. >> >> At present, the FreeBSD port depends upon qt4. Is qt4 still a requirement >> for bat? >> >> I ask because: >> >> * qt4 has been deprecated since December 2015 (i.e. > 3 years) >> * bacula9 bat will be removed from the FreeBSD ports tree today because of >> that deprecation >> * My attempts today to compile without qt4 fail > > bat compiles with Qt5, but you may need to resort to some trickery to > get it to work. > > See the following links about the stuff we need to do to get it working > for Debian (and Gentoo): > > https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/control#L26 > https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/rules#L14 > https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/rules#L185 > https://salsa.debian.org/bacula-team/bacula/blob/master/debian/patches/debian/fix-qmake-binary-source-path > > Not all of that may or may not be applicable to FreeBSD.
Oh. I do not use bat. I don't have the time to get this working now. If someone else does, I'm happy to commit the work. Thank you. -- Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
