Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Thursday 16 June 2005 15:44, Russell Howe wrote: > >>We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the >>status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of >>both returned - is this how it should be? > > > The status is given for all the drives known to the SD.
Should it be, though? Especially if you use the syntax Arno mentioned status storage="Tandberg DLT8000" for example, also displays details of the "Quantum DLT8000" device. If the syntax were: status storage=spanky-sd Then the output would seem more logical... > This is a problem not only for the reason you cite, but in addition, > sometimes > one is printed in SD messages, and sometimes the other. > > In version 1.37, the device "name" is systematically printed as > "Device name (Unix name)" e.g. "DDS-4 (/dev/nst0)". Nice :) -- Russell Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
