>>>>> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:08:28 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> 
> On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:33, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:29, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > >> It's worth noting, that the messages above don't necessarily mean  
> > >> that the
> > >> filesystem mentioned wouln't be backed up at all.
> > >>
> > >> The message is generated, when a mounted filesystem is met, but the
> > >> filesystem may be backed up anyway if it is specifically included  
> > >> in the
> > >> fileset configuration. The message just means, that the mounted  
> > >> filesystem
> > >> isn't backed up as a part of the parent directory's backup.
> > >> Personally, I find this a little bit annoying.
> > 
> > On Aug 13, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > Well the messages are there to warn the unwarry, but it would be  
> > > nice if
> > > someone would submit the code necessary to do a "forward and  
> > > backward" look
> > > through the filesets to see if the filesystem has been specified  
> > > directly
> > > somewhere else so that the message could be suppressed.
> > 
> > Or how about an option to disable these messages in the Message  
> > section?  Trust me when I say that we always backup all we care to.    
> > I never want to see these messages (and have it fact disabled them  
> > for us by editing the source, which isn't all that portable).
> 
> I am not much in favor of an option to disable these messages -- possibly we 
> could put them into a separate message class, but this is getting to be a bit 
> overkill, and previous user comments on this list were not too favorable to 
> that idea.
> 
> I have modified the messages to include the directory from which the 
> filesystem change is not permitted, which gives the user a bit more 
> information about what is going on.
> 
> I think the simplest and best solution is to suppress these messages as I 
> wrote above if they are in fact backed up somewhere else in the backup.  This 
> will ensure that the messages are printed only if there is a danger that the 
> user is missing a partition, but it will also require someone to write some 
> code (well, any solution will).  If it bothers you enough and you would like 
> it fixed, you might try coming up with this kind of code.  

Another workaround is to list the mounted filesystems in an Exclude option.

__Martin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to