Dan Langille wrote: > On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote: > > >> Hmmmm. >> >> I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big >> performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my >> application, 2.2 seems to be /significantly slower/ than 2.02. >> > > Did you specify --enable-batch-insert on your configuration? I found > that in ReleaseNotes. >
Arrgggh. No. I have recompiled it now with that switch but it's off running a long job so I will install the new version with batch-insert when it is done. Thanks Michael -- Do you think that when someone asked George Washington for ID he just whipped out a quarter? - Steven Wright -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
