Le Mer 6 juillet 2011 18:43, John Drescher a écrit : > 2011/7/6 Jake Debord <jake.deb...@gmail.com>: >> I have a machine I back up that when done averages: >> Elapsed time: 41 mins 47 secs >> Priority: 1 >> FD Files Written: 6,948 >> SD Files Written: 6,948 >> FD Bytes Written: 14,587,852,350 (14.58 GB) >> SD Bytes Written: 14,589,273,339 (14.58 GB) >> Rate: 5818.8 KB/s >> Software Compression: 11.7 % >> >> Is this acceptable??? 6Mbps seems slow. I backup my machine and achieve >> a >> little better results >> >> Elapsed time: 3 mins 51 secs >> Priority: 1 >> FD Files Written: 665 >> SD Files Written: 665 >> FD Bytes Written: 2,192,593,865 (2.192 GB) >> SD Bytes Written: 2,192,728,783 (2.192 GB) >> Rate: 9491.7 KB/s >> Software Compression: 9.8 % >> >> Both of our Machines are almost identical in specs. I'm just wondering >> if >> this is typical or if there are tweeks to speeding things up. My setup >> is >> basically out of the box so not much extra done to it. >> >> I also use mysql for the database. >> > > Are you using disk based volumes? If so try this with compression > turned off. Also A Full backup will have a much higher rate than an > Incremental or Differential because more of the time will be spent > looking for the files to backup instead of backing up every file. > Fragmentation of the client disk also plays a large part in backup > rates. > > John >
you could try an iperf for each machine o be sure all is ok with network ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
