Hey
Yesterday we got a NAS-backup appliance with deduplication etc. to test,
and it can export its shares as either CIFS or NFS. When writing to a
CIFS share there were no errors, when writing to a default mounted NFS
share however bacula was unable to restore from any volume due to block
positioning errors.
After reading up on block size stuff and NFS I tried writing and
restoring from the same NFS share, but mounted with the
*"rsize=32768,wsize=32768"* options. This worked like a charm!
Now I'm wondering if I was just lucky, or if this should always work? Is
there someone with experience with bacula and NFS shares that has a
somewhat "optimal" setting for the NFS mount, and perhaps for the bacula
storage config?
What I'm wondering about most is if this will always work correctly with
the default block size of 64,512 bacula uses...
Kind regards,
Jeremy
**** DISCLAIMER ****
http://www.schaubroeck.be/maildisclaimer.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
Learn about the latest advances in developing for the
BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
