Hello Ian,

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Ian Young <i...@iay.org.uk> wrote:

>
> On 13 May 2015, at 07:20, Radosław Korzeniewski <rados...@korzeniewski.net>
> wrote:
>
> I appear to be seeing the same problem with CentOS 6 / CentOS 6
>> combinations:
>>
>>
> OS versions doesn't matter. What is important: Bacula Dir/SD vs. File
> Daemon versions. The supported configuration require Dir/SD in the same
> version every time and FD not newer.
>
>
> I should have been clearer. I meant that I was apparently seeing the same
> problem on at least one setup where the FD, DIR and SD versions were all
> the same.
>
> I take your point, though, that the Director/SD should not be older than
>> the clients, so I need to fix that. Fortunately the (virtual) machine
>> running the Director and Storage daemons is dedicated to that task, so it
>> should be relatively easy to build a new CentOS 7 machine to get 5.2.13.
>>
>
> Recommended version in May 2015 is Bacula 7.0.5, not 5.2.13.
>
>
> I understand that, but deploying 7.0.5 would be significantly harder in my
> environment than moving to 5.2.13 so it would be something of a last resort.
>
> I don't think you're saying that I need to move to the latest version to
> get reliable backups, are you?
>
> If anyone knew of a bug in 5.2.x (or for that matter in 5.0.x) that caused
> differentials to be incomplete, I'd obviously feel differently (but then, I
> imagine Red Hat would too, as 5.2.13 is what they are shipping in their
> most recent release).
>
> I don't think I actually have a version mismatch problem (as I'm seeing
>> the same issue with matched versions), but there are all sorts of reasons
>> this might make my problem go away: there may be a bug in the version of
>> 5.0 shipped with RHEL/CentOS, or I may have a configuration problem. Either
>> way, starting from scratch and transitioning clients over may help.
>>
>
> First of all. Did you ever test that it is not working?
>
>
> As stated, I have seen significant data loss when attempting to restore a
> production system. This is not theoretical, although perhaps the subject
> line led you astray.
>
> Differential backup does not backup a files which were deleted in the mean
> time. So in real system it is very unlikely (it must meet a specific
> conditions) you get the same number of files backed up in Incremental and
> Differential levels.
>
>
> I don't believe this is the problem I'm seeing. For example, from my
> original mail:
>
> | 9,929 | srv-c701-backup | 2015-05-01 23:05:04 | B    | I     |   91,030
> | 3,450,906,888 | T
> | 9,938 | srv-c701-backup | 2015-05-02 23:05:03 | B    | D     |      112
> |     2,184,302 | T
>
> The 91,000 files in job 9929 were NOT all deleted before job 9938 was run,
> but do not appear in that job.
>

​You should compare the job 9938 with the last full backup and not the
incremental one. Radoslaw explained that in the second post in this thread.


>
>     -- Ian
>
> ​Best regards,
Ana​


>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to