> On Jan 3, 2016, at 5:11 AM, Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> wrote: > > On 12/31/15 22:58, Dan Langille wrote: >> I think we can live with the extra step. There is no time frame for this >> change. I'll do it within the next few months. >> >> Comments? > > Could the same be applied to /usr/local/share/bacula/query.sql? > > This would *save* us an extra step (the one of replacing the empty sample > file with a good one after every upgrade).
Good idea. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
