Hello,
See below ...
On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote:
while my question is specifically related to getting *new(-ish)* bacula
installed and running on centos 7 -- i think my real question is -- why are
there no new-ish rpms for centos?
what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and the current bacula version
is 9.0.x. since the latest rpms are only fedora, is bacula 9 considered
stable/production ready?
You will need to talk to RedHat about that problem. I am not very happy
with them releasing such an old version, but I do not have much clout
with them. If a lot of users write to RedHat (not CentOS, who only
rebuilds the RedHat releases) maybe something will happen.
Also I have been working on having community released binaries. This is
almost a reality and will surely be done within the next month. I am
the current bottleneck for the documentation, but I am back from
vacation and will remove the bottleneck as soon as I can.
Best regards,
Kern
donna
--
Sent from: http://bacula.10910.n7.nabble.com/Bacula-Users-f3.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
