On 04/09/18 11:31, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote:
>> what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and the current bacula version
>> is 9.0.x.  since the latest rpms are only fedora, is bacula 9 considered
>> stable/production ready?
> You will need to talk to RedHat about that problem.  I am not very happy 
> with them releasing such an old version,

Honestly, this is an endemic problem with Red Hat.  ...And yet then they
leap headlong at unproven, misconceived projects like systemd.

Ask me about kgcc in the *first* Red Hat 7.0 sometime.

  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  Landline: +1.603.293.8485
  Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Bacula-users mailing list

Reply via email to