On 11/4/21 19:10, Andras Horvai wrote:
I think the issue is the number of files/directories on the file
server I want to backup. Bacula-fd cannot count them... but
bacula-fd.exe daemon does not use/does not want to use more resources
on the system. Can I ask bacula-fd somehow to use more resources to
speed up its operation? :)
Your problem may be the result of creating a VSS snapshot on a DFS
replicated folder. Do you see any Event 513 errors in the Application
log on the Windows machine? If so, see
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-server/backup-and-storage/event-id-513-vss-windows-server.
Is it taking a long time to generate the VSS snapshot? In DFS
management console, you can configure the DFS Replication group schedule
for 'No replication' during certain times. Try turning off DFS
replication during the time the backup job is running.
Cheers,
Josh Fisher
Thanks,
Andras
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 1:12 PM Jose Alberto <j.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
Client: ..... 11.0.5 (03Jun21) Microsoft Windows
Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1 (build 7601),
64-bit,Cross-compile,Win64
Rate: 26497.7 KB/s
Software Compression: None
Comm Line Compression: 80.7% 5.2:1
Hosts,, guest on vmware.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 8:48 PM Jose Alberto <j.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally. I have seen the highest speeds in AIX, then in
Linux and finally in Windows. With Windows of 40MB I have not
passed.
Virtual or physical server, antivirus, vss, type of data to be
backed up, are factors that influence Windows
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:00 PM Andras Horvai
<andras.hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
1. AV exclusion did not solve the issue. Backup is still
incredibly slow from this client.
I forgot to mention that I am trying to backup a folder
which is DFS synchronized. I do not know if it matters or
not.
During the backup I do not see high cpu or memory
utilization on client caused by bacula-fd.
It looks like that bacula-fd "cannot find out" what to
send to the storage daemon... strage...
This is the first time I have such issue...
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:19 PM Heitor Faria
<hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote:
"1. The windows 2019 server has the default Virus and
Threat protection settings no 3rd party virus scanner
is deployed on the server. Can you recommend what to
check? How to exclude bacula-fd?"
Consult your AV provider to find out.
"2. This would be a bigger project in our case but
sure I will consider this... "
The 11.x version (odd) from bacula.org
<http://bacula.org> is also open source. Do not
confuse with the Bacula Enterprise Edition (even)
versions.
Rgds.
--
MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA)
CEO Bacula LatAm
mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971
mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220
América Latina
[ http://bacula.lat/]
-------- Original Message --------
From: Andras Horvai <andras.hor...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 04:40 PM
To: bacula-users <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow transfer rate - MS
Win 2019
Hello Heitor,
How much is very slow? i think on a 1 Gigabit/s
connection around 100 Mbit/s is slow considering that
the network test between sd and the client gives 925.6
Mbit/s - 977.6 Mbtit/s result
(I used bacula to test it) The problem is that when
it comes to real backup it drops to around 100 Mbit/s.
1. The windows 2019 server has the default Virus and
Threat protection settings no 3rd party virus scanner
is deployed on the server. Can you recommend what to
check? How to exclude bacula-fd?
2. This would be a bigger project in our case but sure
I will consider this...
3. Well this is something I can take into account as
well....
Thanks,
Andras
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 1:47 PM Heitor Faria
<hei...@bacula.com.br> wrote:
Hello Andras,
How much is very low?
Bacula only displays the transfer rate after the
sw compression reduction, what IMHO is very
misleading since it is a "higher-the better"
value. Worst decision ever.
You gotta divide the ReadBytes by the Job Duration
to have the processed data rate.
Anyway:
1. Please check for Windows AV presence and put
the bacula-fd as an exception. Try again.
2. Update Bacula to the latest 11.0.5 packages
from bacula.org <http://bacula.org>, which has a
few improvements.
3. Ultimately, you can manually split the FileSet
in the Bacula Community edition to paralelize the
workload and eventually achieve a better
performance, specially for Windows different volumes.
Rgds.
--
MSc Heitor Faria (Miami/USA)
CEO Bacula LatAm
mobile1: + 1 909 655-8971
mobile2: + 55 61 98268-4220
América Latina
[ http://bacula.lat/]
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
#############################
# Sistema Operativo: Debian #
# Caracas, Venezuela #
#############################
--
#############################
# Sistema Operativo: Debian #
# Caracas, Venezuela #
#############################
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
