On 1/2/22 16:08, Heitor Faria wrote:
That said, I never understood this very common user fetish of installing Bacula
components in the NAS.
Efficiency, reliability, less points of failure, etc...
OK: you avoid one more network node but the hardware is not designed to handle
the extra workload.
At least for the SD the extra workload is negligible.
Didn't try the FD.
If you want to write backups to the NAS, NFS or iSCSI if supported.
Been there, done that, never again (unless there's no way to use the SD
on the NAS, of course).
bye
av.
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
