Marleen,

It seems to me that GLAAD (and I probably meant PFLAG, actually--I had to run out and couldn't look any of these up) would assume that the issue of whether or not a transgender situation involved one partner being "gay" was of little importance, as all such sexual orientations are morally equivalent. Baha'is would understand the situation otherwise. I'll grant you that this might not change how to deal with the situation I hypothesized, except that there might be less support for a Baha'i who felt his/her spouse had acted selfishly in marrying them under false pretenses (but I don't know that for sure).

However, even if the morality or immorality of being gay, straight, or something else were not the issue, Baha'is should take the likelihood of damaging a marriage to be very serious, indeed. I think that, in a "regular," straight marriage, my deciding that I needed to get a divorce so I could be happy, no matter how "deeply happy and fulfilled" I think it will make me, may not be an acceptable thing to God. I find Western culture to be much more concerned with the individual's quest for happiness: if something might allow me to fulfill my dreams, find my true soulmate, or whatever, and I have to get a divorce to do it, I believe that many Americans would say, "Sad, but you've got to do it if you think it's what you need." But, that's not what I get from the Writings. In this light, I suspect most human beings don't know where happiness really lies, or what it actually consists of.

>Right. But what if a man and a woman marry and later one of them has gender reassignment surgery? Then it appears that you have a gay couple, either two women or two men, depending on if it is the man or the woman who undergoes the surgery. In the eyes of the law, their marriage is still valid. Doesn't the Faith recognize legal marriages regardless of what the couple look like? Chromosomally, the couple remain male and female.

I see no way in which the Faith accepts gay marriage, no matter how many governments pass laws to that effect. Of course, such marriages are recognized as legal by the state, but are not Baha'i marriages. Obviously, this discussion is about something more difficult to define, so I don't know if the Baha'i Administration would get involved in such a "changed" marriage.

>So what will the Faith accept as defining gender? What medical experts say? Chromosomes? Body appearance? What the person believes his or her gender to be? If a female changes to a male and later enrolls in the Faith, can he serve on the House? If a male is born with ambiguous genitalia and raised female, can he serve on the House if he chooses to later identify as male? The bottom line is can any of us really know the original gender of a person if he or she chooses not to reveal it?

No, we can't. Anymore than if a person is an alcoholic or drug addict and manages to keep their addiction completely hidden. Or a person secretly hates the Faith, yet disguises themselves as a Baha'i? Completely??? I do question the ability to pull off such deceptions, but, no doubt, somebody will manage to fool people. Anyway, for the sexual issues, I think I won't worry about differences that make no difference, such as personal medical information that is never revealed. Should something come up publicly, aren't we lucky that the House has to decide this? ;-)

>I don't expect any answers; I just think it is interesting to think about. Marleen

I agree that this is an interesting subject, some of which we may encounter. I am not in the situation stated, so it may be presumptuous of me to speculate. Nevertheless, just for the heckuvit, here are my (perhaps uninformed) speculations on what could be a Baha'i viewpoint: 1) if an existing marriage is not in question, then getting one's sexual identity "corrected" is OK; 2) if one is a*already married*, then changing one's external orientation is a betrayal of one's marriage agreement, whether one divorces or not (which doesn't necessarily mean it is forbidden, just not a selfless/detached kind of act that rises to the highest spiritual standards--and most human acts don't); and 3) if one is married and changes to the gender of one's spouse without divorcing, the*other* spouse will then have to either choose to have a "gay" relationship in violation of the Faith's teachings, live platonically and thus be deprived of a marriage in practice, or go ahead and ask for divorce themselves. Again, it seems massively unfair for the "changing" spouse to have put the other in that situation. (Yes, I know that Life is Not Fair.) We're not discussing the effect on any children at this point, or the "appearance of wrongdoing" that could taint the Faith in the eyes of the public.

What a terrible personal test this would be for all concerned.

Yours,

Jeanine

M Chase wrote:
How would Bahai assumptions be different?

Jeanine H. wrote:
Sounds like a long forum discussion with GLAAD would be in order, tho' Baha'is still won't be operating from the same set of assumptions...






The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__________________________________________________


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to