Navendu Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I never attended any sessions about bike designing and all so I can't > understand the fine details about bike design but what I have gained > by listening to people, byk is *not* a good looking vehicle, specially > if victor and fiero are refered as non-good looking. >
First of all I separated Victor and Fiero. I admit that the Fiero wasn't bad. But I personally disliked the Victor. And what I stated was my opinion. And I had specific rules against which I graded the bikes. And if you follow my grading scheme, you would understand what I mean. > > Just wonder, BYK was more VFM than Victor/Fiero, it looks better than > Fiero/Victor, its mileage is better than Victor/Fiero...still I don't > think BYK sold in as many no's as Victor/Fiero. > It sure was not the looks. It was the overall appeal. There are so many products which are good, but go unnoticed, for many many reasons. Some examples are in the TVS stable only and many other manufacturers. I am not saying that the Byk was good. But I did consider it over the Victor. Ofcourse there are some lemons. And as I said, my choices are queer. People who know me can see it from my choice of cellphones. Cheers, Glifford.
