On 7/24/07, Glifford Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Navendu Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You mean to say byk looks better than fiero/victor? You made my day > > buddy. Thanks. > > > > Again :) > > Now lets talk Victor first. Take a look at the first generation one. > Look at the headlamp, the side panels, the tank, the rear flank. Try > to get a flow or lines that are parallel. Try to find some uniformity > or pattern. You can't. The headlamp looks sore. The design is > utilitarian and is more function than form. It doesn't flow. > > Now look at the Byk. It was designed as a simple basic machine. Not > as a superbike or even a superbike wannabe. For that it is a good > design. Just look at all the components from the headlamp to the tail > lamp. See how the fairing gels with the tank, the side panels and the > rear flanks. It flows. Lots of parallel lines. > > The fiero was a decent looker and I admit looked a lot better than the > F2. But it never appealed to me... didn't dislike it either... like > the Victor. > I never attended any sessions about bike designing and all so I can't understand the fine details about bike design but what I have gained by listening to people, byk is *not* a good looking vehicle, specially if victor and fiero are refered as non-good looking.
Just wonder, BYK was more VFM than Victor/Fiero, it looks better than Fiero/Victor, its mileage is better than Victor/Fiero...still I don't think BYK sold in as many no's as Victor/Fiero. Nav
