James, Your comparison is not valid. You are comparing an older 150 to a new 180. If you compare a 150, 180 of the same generation, am sure you will note that the larger engine will give lesser mileage under same riding conditions. The key words being "same generation" and "same riding conditions"
On Jan 20, 2008 1:24 PM, james. r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yogesh Hi, > > Ur Q is a very vital one. First tell us more abt u, ur usage, ur primary > need. If u r a highway rider 180 is the best. If u r a city rider 150 is > the > best. > > To explain more abt me my signature will tell u. After 4 years of using > 150 > I thought of upgrading it to a 180 but it estimated to 20k rs to rebuid > the > bike as 180. So sold off & bought a 180 & of course burnt 43k of my > pocket. > My benefits.....better pick-up, black theme, ES, New bike, Better gears, > smooth engine & even better mileage. Will u believe my 180 gives 55+ when > ridden sedately. > > My final point, a 180 can be riden as 150 & u can expect better mileage > but > 150 cannot be ridden as 180... > > >>>>On 19/01/2008, yogesh_b_c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<yogesh_b_c%40yahoo.com>> > wrote:<<<< > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > james.r > The Speed Steed.... > > "Stormy", Pulsar-180 dtsi FTB, 12.1 k kms, TN09 AQ 5628, Jul 06. > Pulsar 150 KS non-dtsi, 40.3 k kms, TN23 H 4992, Aug 02 - Jul 06. > > > -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
