So true! Aameen! Abu Zahrin Abu Bakar wrote: > they want to talk to taliban because they are fighting a losing war but no > talking to Hamas , non of their concern , except they are real > hypocrites, > not able to differentiate between freedom fighters(Hamas) , and > zionist war mongerers > at the expense of the American tax payers, they are blind in the eyes > as well in the hearts.unless to morrow they revert to islam then only > they will see the light and the truth , pray for them to see the > light, ameen! > > --- On *Mon, 3/23/09, Anisa Abd el Fattah /<[email protected]>/* wrote: > > > From: Anisa Abd el Fattah <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [bangla-vision] OK for US to talk to Taliban but not > Hamas? > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 12:00 PM > > The real hypocrisy and truth is that our government claims that > the Taliban and Al Qadea murdered 3000 Americans on Sept. 11, > 2001, yet they are willing to talk to them. Hamas is a resistance > organization that is fighting for the very existence of the > Palestinian people, who has never done anything to the US, yet we > call them terrorists. This makes it clear who is running US > foreign policy. We can talk to the Taliban because they are goyim > who kill goyim. We cannot talk to Hamas because they are goyim who > fight Zionist Jews the so called chosen people. If you don't think > that the US and Europe are under Zionist rule, think again. > > Anisa > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM, liz allen <spktruthtopower@ > yahoo.com </mc/[email protected]>> wrote: > > Well thats because you have Hillary Clinton, and Dennis > Ross...making sure there is never a meeting with the > democratically elected government.. ..Hamas! Taliban has no > government, never elected to anything...more double > standards... Mr. President. > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > *From:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com > </mc/[email protected]>> > *To:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com > </mc/[email protected]>> > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2009 10:14:03 AM > *Subject:* [AmeriConscience] OK for US to talk to Taliban but > not Hamas? > > OK to talk to the Taliban but not Hamas? - by Osama Abu Katta > Date: 22 / 03 / 2009 Time: 15: 09 http://www.maannews > .net/en/index. php?opr=ShowDeta ils&ID=36611 > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611> > ????? ???? > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#>????? > ???? > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#> > > <http://www.maanimages.com/index.php?opr=Details&ID=56261> > [Ma'anImages] > > US President Obama said throughout his campaign that he would > meet with his Iranian counterpart. At the time, Senator > Hillary Clinton opposed him and suggested that this was naïve. > > Meanwhile, reports from London talked about a line of > communication or dialogue between Hizbullah and British > officials, a European parliamentary delegation recently met > with members of Hamas' political leadership in exile in > Damascus to discuss ways to end the group's international > isolation, and the media also reported that the White House > did not rule out negotiations with the Taliban. > > In an obvious contradiction to this flow of American and > Western diplomacy, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it > clear to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that the promised > financial aid to Gaza is conditioned on prohibiting any access > to this aid by Hamas. Moreover Clinton made it clear that > Hamas must comply with the Quartet's demands, mainly that > Hamas must acknowledge Israel's right to exist, before joining > a unity government and having access to the US aid. > > Hamas is standing at a critical junction and facing mounting > pressure to make some time-sensitive decisions on a wide range > of issues. Recovering from the Gaza war, breaking the siege on > Gaza, negotiations with Israel on a long-term truce, > negotiations on a prisoner swap and Fatah-Hamas reconciliation > talks are all urgent and sensitive negotiations, especially in > light of Israeli political developments and its government > changes. The stakes are high for Hamas but the price is just > as high. Any compromises to be made by Hamas will assuredly > mean a significant change in the political map of the region. > > Hamas' compliance with the Quartet's conditions could open the > door for the movement to take part in a Palestinian national > unity government that is able to deal with the international > community and end the siege, which could facilitate and > perhaps even speed up the Palestinian national reconciliation > process as a whole. > > A national unity government is without a doubt a pressing > popular national Palestinian demand that Hamas is very aware > of and would give Hamas legitimacy as well as grounds to work > in the West Bank. Compliance with the Quartet's conditions > would also mean giving Hamas access to the international > stage, something Hamas has been eager to achieve for a long > time. Such a compromise, though, would at the same time cost > Hamas dearly if it is made without approval from Syria and > Iran, who are considered Hamas' backbone and its strongest > supporters in the region. > > Analysts think the key to any advancement in the internal > Palestinian situation on one hand and the Palestinian- Israeli > situation on the other must be parallel to regional > negotiations that involve Syria and Iran. > > One factor that strengthens Hamas' negotiating power with > Fatah is the fact that the new Israeli government is hardcore > right wing, and refuses a two-state solution to the > Palestinian- Israeli conflict, promotes the expansion of > settlements and rejects any negotiations on Jerusalem. Such an > Israeli government undermines Abbas and the rest of the "Arab > moderate leaders," and automatically empowers Hamas and other > resistance groups in the West Bank and Gaza. > > Critics of the US policy of not negotiating with Hamas ask: Is > Hamas more of a threat to the US than the Taliban and Iran? > How can the US justify talking to one group categorized as a > terrorist entity but not another one? > > Media reports from Egypt noted that Egypt has dispatched two > of its top officials to convince the Americans and the > Europeans to accept a weaker commitment by Hamas to peace with > Israel for the sake of forging a united Palestinian > government. The US and Europe will have to decide soon on the > nature of the relationship they want to have with Hamas and > the upcoming Israeli government keeping in mind that both were > democratically elected. > > Refusing to talk to Hamas while embracing a right-wing Israeli > government would be considered an early blow to President > Osama's efforts to send a different message to the Middle East > than did his predecessor George W. Bush. > > > > > Print Preview > > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Print&ID=36611> > > Send to friend > > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Friend&Op=FriendSend&ID=36611> > > > > > > > > > >
-- Linda *http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/> "If we shadows have offended, Think but this, and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd here While these visions did appear..." - William Shakespeare * --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bangla-vision" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
